Safety on the GRAJ protocol. One fee. 195 countries. Join the protocol.
Commerce infrastructure with no safety position becomes infrastructure for whatever is most profitable to abuse. The two things that matter most are knowing who participates and making actions traceable — both of which this protocol does structurally rather than by moderation alone.
Actions that can hurt somebody require a level of verification proportionate to the harm. That is the ladder rather than a single gate, so an ordinary operator is not forced through an enhanced check to do ordinary things.
Every meaningful action is an event with an actor and a time, in a log nobody can edit. Most abuse depends on being unattributable, and removing that removes a great deal of it without any moderation at all.
Self-approval is the structural weakness in almost every trust system. Verification, certificate validation and approval decisions all require a party other than the subject, including for administrators.
Anything urgent involving harm belongs with the relevant authorities rather than a support queue. For everything else, a report creates a record with a time on it, which is what makes a pattern visible.