Repair on the GRAJ protocol. One fee. 195 countries. Join the protocol.
Repair keeps goods in use, produces a second margin on inventory already paid for, and is treated by most commerce systems as an absence of a sale. A protocol that only counts new units quietly discourages fixing anything.
Somebody fixing a product is adding value. Contribution is measured from the event log across every role, and there is no principled reason repair should count for less than a sale of a replacement.
What was wrong, what was done, which parts and who did it. That record is what a warranty position and a resale price are both built on, and it is exactly what is normally lost the moment the item leaves the bench.
A repair with unknown parts is a repair a future buyer cannot assess. Recording what went in is the difference between a history and an assertion.
Designed, not built. The append-only log is the right place for an item history and exists; the repair flow and unit-level identity do not.